Konsep Biaya Produksi Produk Pertanian dan Pangan

Marza Dona, Syakhroni Harfan, Zefriyenni Zefriyenni

Sari


Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengkaji konsep biaya produksi dalam industri pangan dan pertanian. Pemahaman yang mendalam tentang konsep biaya produksi tidak hanya membantu petani, atau perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang pertanian untuk menentukan harga jual yang kompetitif, tetapi juga berfungsi sebagai metode penghitungan margin keuntungan, dan mengefisienkan operasional. Penelitian ini ditulis menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) yang bermanfaat untuk mengidentifikasi, mengevaluasi, dan menyimpulkan hasil penelitian terkait topik yang dikaji secara sistematis dan terstruktur. Dalam pelaksanaannya, penelitian ini menggunakan model PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), yang bertujuan untuk memastikan transparansi, dan akuntabilitas dalam setiap tahapan proses SLR. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Hasil penelusuran jurnal terindeks scopus dengan kata kunci big data dan manajemen data pertanian diperoleh 84 literatur, dimana 62 literatur memasuki fase seleksi, dan pada fase retrieval tetap tersisa 62 literatur. Setelah jurnal di-download, kemudian di-upload ke sistem, tersisa 25 artikel saja yang paling relevan dengan topik. Biaya produksi pada pembuatan produk pertanian dan industri pangan, menghitung keuntungan dari biaya produksi yang meliputi biaya tenaga kerja, biaya bahan baku, biaya listrik, biaya pre-treatment, biaya bahan untuk pemeliharaan tanaman, dan biaya pakan. Biaya pemeliharaan tanaman, dan biaya pakan merupakan biaya terbesar pada sektor pertanian dan peternakan, jumlahnya bisa mencapai 60% dari total biaya keseluruhan. Sedangkan pada industri pangan, biaya pre-treatment menjadi biaya paling besar, mencapai 33% dari total biaya produksi. Intensifikasi merupakan strategi dalam menekan biaya produksi pada sistem pertanian berkelanjutan, sedangkan biokonversi, dan daur ulang menjadi strategi menekan biaya produksi pada industri pangan.

Teks Lengkap:

Download PDF

Referensi


Al-Sai, Z., Husin, M., Syed-Mohamad, S., Abdullah, R., Zitar, R., Abualigah, L., & Gandomi, A. (2023). Big data maturity assessment models: a Systematic literature review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010002

Al Mahmud, M., Mobarak, M., & Hossain, N. (2024). Emerging trends in biomaterials for sustainable food packaging: A comprehensive review. Heliyon, 10(1), e24122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24122

Ali, M., Islam, M., Islam, M., Dipto, S., & Bari, M. (2024). Assessing the cropland changes into agroforestry and its livelihood outcomes: Evidence from northern Bangladesh. Trees, Forests and People, 15(January), 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100497

Augustiniene, E., Valanciene, E., Matulis, P., Syrpas, M., Jonuskiene, I., & Malys, N. (2022). Bioproduction of l- and d-lactic acids: advances and trends in microbial strain application and engineering. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 42(3), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1940088

Badghan, F., Namdar, R., & Valizadeh, N. (2020). Challenges and opportunities of transgenic agricultural products in Iran: Convergence of perspectives using Delphi technique. Agriculture and Food Security, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-020-00259-5

Bich, T., Duong, H., Ketbot, P., Phitsuwan, P., Waeonukul, R., Tachaapaikoon, C., … Pason, P. (2021). Bioconversion of Untreated Corn Hull into L- Malic Acid by Trifunctional Xylanolytic Enzyme from Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus B-6 and Acetobacter tropicalis H-1. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 31(9), 1262–1271.

Bouhia, Y., Hafidi, M., Ouhdouch, Y., Mohammed, E., Mphatso, C., Zeroual, Y., & Lyamlouli, K. (2022). Conversion of waste into organo ‑ mineral fertilizers : current technological trends and prospects. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 21(2), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-022-09619-y

Cakmakci, Y., Hurma, H., & Cakmakci, C. (2024). Determination of Consumer Perceptions of Eco-Friendly Food Products Using Unsupervised Machine Learning * Çevre Dostu Gıda Ürünlerine Yönelik Tüketici Algısının Denetimsiz Makine Öğrenmesi Kullanılarak Belirlenmesi Öz. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 21(May), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1319077

Chojnacka, K., Moustakas, K., & Mikulewicz, M. (2022). Valorisation of agri-food waste to fertilisers is a challenge in implementing the circular economy concept in practice. Environmental Pollution, 312(July), 119906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119906

Cubas, A., Provin, A., Dutra, A., Mouro, C., & Gouveia, I. (2023). Advances in the Production of Biomaterials through Kombucha Using Food Waste: Concepts, Challenges, and Potential. Polymers, 15(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15071701

Dhagat, S., & Jujjavarapu, S. (2021). Biorefinery system for production of thermostable exopolysaccharide by a novel thermophile Brevibacillus borstelensis MK878423 and its study on impact of glucose utilization. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 1–11.

Dinger, F., & Platt, U. (2020). Towards an artificial carbohydrates supply on earth. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4(July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00090

Friederike, H. S., Joachim, D., & Bärbel, K. (2021). Was ist eine ökologische Schadensschwelle ? Gesunde Pflanze, 11(March 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-021-00551-9

Girotto, F., Gueguen, S., Galeazzi, A., & Piazza, L. (2022). Water – food – energy nexus : Assessing challenges in the trend toward digitalization : The case study of an Italian winemaking industry. Sustainability, 41(February), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13893

Kamusoko, R., Jingura, R., Parawira, W., & Chikwambi, Z. (2021). Strategies for valorization of crop residues into biofuels and other value-added products. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2282

Khoshnevisan, B., He, L., Xu, M., Valverde-Pérez, B., Sillman, J., Mitraka, G., … Angelidaki, I. (2022). From renewable energy to sustainable protein sources: Advancement, challenges, and future roadmaps. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 157(July 2021), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112041

Liu, H., Liu, N., Zhang, D., Zhu, J., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Incorporating economy and water demand rate uncertainty into decision-making for agricultural water allocation during droughts. Water Supply, 23(10), 4252–4262. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2023.236

Malakar, B., Das, D., & Mohanty, K. (2023). Utilization of waste peel extract for cultivation of microalgal isolates: a study of lipid productivity and growth kinetics. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13(18), 17017–17026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02313-7

Martins, A., dos Anjos, F., & da Silva, D. (2023). The lean farm: application of tools and concepts of lean manufacturing in Agro-Pastoral Crops. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032597

Meltzer, H., Eneroth, H., Erkkola, M., Trolle, E., Fantke, P., Helenius, J., … Ydersbond, T. (2024). Challenges and opportunities when moving food production and consumption toward sustainable diets in the Nordics: a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023. Food and Nutrition Research, 1(68), 1–39. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v68.10489

Pagliaccia, D., Bodaghi, S., Chen, X., Stevenson, D., Deyett, E., De Francesco, A., … Vidalakis, G. (2020). Two Food Waste By-Products Selectively Stimulate Beneficial Resident Citrus Host-Associated Microbes in a Zero-Runoff Indoor Plant Production System. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4(December), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.593568

Rantheesh, J., Indran, S., Raja, S., & Siengchin, S. (2023). Isolation and characterization of novel micro cellulose from Azadirachta indica A. Juss agro-industrial residual waste oil cake for futuristic applications. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 13(5), 4393–4411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03467-0

Routray, W., Chetry, R., & Jena, B. (2023). Drying of food industry and agricultural waste: Current scenario and future perspectives. Drying Technology, 41(5), 628–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2022.2118767

Vaško, Ž., & Kovačević, I. (2020). Comparison of economic efficiency of organic versus conventional farming in the conditions of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Agriculture and Forestry. https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.66.2.16

Yoon, I., Oh, S., & Kim, S. (2024). Sustainable animal agriculture in the United States and the implication in Republic of Korea. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 66(2), 279–294.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/mirai.v10i2.9968

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Flag Counter

Creative Commons License

JURNAL MIRAI MANAGEMENT is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Web Analytics